Comments on: Eating Red Meat Increases Risk Of… http://www.foodess.com/2009/03/eating-red-meat-increases-risk-of/ Come Hungry Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:45:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Khalil http://www.foodess.com/2009/03/eating-red-meat-increases-risk-of/comment-page-1/#comment-451 Khalil Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:19:11 +0000 http://www.foodess.com/?p=606#comment-451 For me, take a small quantity of red meat should be ok, hey how do we live without it. I mean it much-much better than taking a pork (pig meat) right? that not good for your health also. A little quantity is better than never.Is like your fasting for years without taking carbonate drink like Pepsi etc. For me, take a small quantity of red meat should be ok, hey how do we live without it. I mean it much-much better than taking a pork (pig meat) right? that not good for your health also. A little quantity is better than never.Is like your fasting for years without taking carbonate drink like Pepsi etc.

]]> By: Khalil http://www.foodess.com/2009/03/eating-red-meat-increases-risk-of/comment-page-1/#comment-2034 Khalil Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:19:00 +0000 http://www.foodess.com/?p=606#comment-2034 For me, take a small quantity of red meat should be ok, hey how do we live without it. I mean it much-much better than taking a pork (pig meat) right? that not good for your health also. A little quantity is better than never.Is like your fasting for years without taking carbonate drink like Pepsi etc. For me, take a small quantity of red meat should be ok, hey how do we live without it. I mean it much-much better than taking a pork (pig meat) right? that not good for your health also. A little quantity is better than never.Is like your fasting for years without taking carbonate drink like Pepsi etc.

]]> By: David http://www.foodess.com/2009/03/eating-red-meat-increases-risk-of/comment-page-1/#comment-396 David Sun, 03 May 2009 17:17:41 +0000 http://www.foodess.com/?p=606#comment-396 Indeed yes - well said and thanks for saying it! We are evolved to eat meat after all - though not to eat a lot of the rubbish that modern life happily calls food! If you trace our diet back to what we 'originally' developed to eat, it is interesting to note that the things NOT on that list corresponds very strongly to the things that cause the most allergic reactions and intolerances - like milk and wheat (bread) etc. There's a certain sense in that, when you consider how fast humanity has developed and changed its diets. We started making bread - we started cooking things that were inedible like grains and beans - etc etc. Those are the new things we have to deal with, it seems. Meat in itself seems one of the grand originals and always seems a positive thing to me! And that's where the argument begins with those who have somehow convinced themselves, thanks to the fast food horrors maybe and to reports like you are referring to, that it is something intrinsically evil. Indeed yes – well said and thanks for saying it! We are evolved to eat meat after all – though not to eat a lot of the rubbish that modern life happily calls food! If you trace our diet back to what we ‘originally’ developed to eat, it is interesting to note that the things NOT on that list corresponds very strongly to the things that cause the most allergic reactions and intolerances – like milk and wheat (bread) etc. There’s a certain sense in that, when you consider how fast humanity has developed and changed its diets. We started making bread – we started cooking things that were inedible like grains and beans – etc etc. Those are the new things we have to deal with, it seems. Meat in itself seems one of the grand originals and always seems a positive thing to me! And that’s where the argument begins with those who have somehow convinced themselves, thanks to the fast food horrors maybe and to reports like you are referring to, that it is something intrinsically evil.

]]> By: David http://www.foodess.com/2009/03/eating-red-meat-increases-risk-of/comment-page-1/#comment-2033 David Sun, 03 May 2009 17:17:00 +0000 http://www.foodess.com/?p=606#comment-2033 Indeed yes - well said and thanks for saying it! We are evolved to eat meat after all - though not to eat a lot of the rubbish that modern life happily calls food! If you trace our diet back to what we 'originally' developed to eat, it is interesting to note that the things NOT on that list corresponds very strongly to the things that cause the most allergic reactions and intolerances - like milk and wheat (bread) etc. There's a certain sense in that, when you consider how fast humanity has developed and changed its diets. We started making bread - we started cooking things that were inedible like grains and beans - etc etc. Those are the new things we have to deal with, it seems. Meat in itself seems one of the grand originals and always seems a positive thing to me! And that's where the argument begins with those who have somehow convinced themselves, thanks to the fast food horrors maybe and to reports like you are referring to, that it is something intrinsically evil. Indeed yes – well said and thanks for saying it! We are evolved to eat meat after all – though not to eat a lot of the rubbish that modern life happily calls food! If you trace our diet back to what we ‘originally’ developed to eat, it is interesting to note that the things NOT on that list corresponds very strongly to the things that cause the most allergic reactions and intolerances – like milk and wheat (bread) etc. There’s a certain sense in that, when you consider how fast humanity has developed and changed its diets. We started making bread – we started cooking things that were inedible like grains and beans – etc etc. Those are the new things we have to deal with, it seems. Meat in itself seems one of the grand originals and always seems a positive thing to me! And that’s where the argument begins with those who have somehow convinced themselves, thanks to the fast food horrors maybe and to reports like you are referring to, that it is something intrinsically evil.

]]> By: Kunoichi http://www.foodess.com/2009/03/eating-red-meat-increases-risk-of/comment-page-1/#comment-311 Kunoichi Tue, 31 Mar 2009 01:12:13 +0000 http://www.foodess.com/?p=606#comment-311 Junkfoodscience <a href="http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2009/03/more-reindeer-games.html" rel="nofollow">covered this "study", too</a>. Just another data dredge. Someone hand me a steak... I'm hankering for some red meat! ;-) Junkfoodscience covered this “study”, too. Just another data dredge.

Someone hand me a steak… I’m hankering for some red meat! ;-)

]]> By: Kunoichi http://www.foodess.com/2009/03/eating-red-meat-increases-risk-of/comment-page-1/#comment-2032 Kunoichi Tue, 31 Mar 2009 01:12:00 +0000 http://www.foodess.com/?p=606#comment-2032 Junkfoodscience <a href="http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2009/03/more-reindeer-games.html" rel="nofollow">covered this "study", too</a>. Just another data dredge. Someone hand me a steak... I'm hankering for some red meat! ;-) Junkfoodscience covered this “study”, too. Just another data dredge.

Someone hand me a steak… I’m hankering for some red meat! ;-)

]]> By: Elyse http://www.foodess.com/2009/03/eating-red-meat-increases-risk-of/comment-page-1/#comment-292 Elyse Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:34:50 +0000 http://www.foodess.com/?p=606#comment-292 I'm not a big meat eater, but that said, I'm always skeptical of publications like this. Chances are, they looked at people who ONLY ate red meat or something. Well, duh, everything in moderation is a good motto to live by. Oy, I hate that these publications create such hype! I’m not a big meat eater, but that said, I’m always skeptical of publications like this. Chances are, they looked at people who ONLY ate red meat or something. Well, duh, everything in moderation is a good motto to live by. Oy, I hate that these publications create such hype!

]]> By: Elyse http://www.foodess.com/2009/03/eating-red-meat-increases-risk-of/comment-page-1/#comment-2031 Elyse Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:34:00 +0000 http://www.foodess.com/?p=606#comment-2031 I'm not a big meat eater, but that said, I'm always skeptical of publications like this. Chances are, they looked at people who ONLY ate red meat or something. Well, duh, everything in moderation is a good motto to live by. Oy, I hate that these publications create such hype! I’m not a big meat eater, but that said, I’m always skeptical of publications like this. Chances are, they looked at people who ONLY ate red meat or something. Well, duh, everything in moderation is a good motto to live by. Oy, I hate that these publications create such hype!

]]> By: Anthony http://www.foodess.com/2009/03/eating-red-meat-increases-risk-of/comment-page-1/#comment-291 Anthony Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:34:50 +0000 http://www.foodess.com/?p=606#comment-291 This "study" is a joke. They compared two extremes and the researcher himself called the added risks "modest" and it is full of common sense that anyone should know. I guess we're supposed to take it seriously due to the quantity of participants but they don't even delve into the socio-economic status of the participants. He also stated that people had to go off memory of what they ate?? Talk about a waste of money.....looks to me like more "global warming" bs and propaganda. I guess this study is meant mainly for the "Sheeple" as I like to call them (see PETA supporters/morons). Anyone knows that most things are fine IN MODERATION and that some lean meat can prevent chronic disease when eaten as part of a balanced diet. What we need is a study showing how the crap we feed these animals is the biggest detriment to our health and probably contributes to most of the health issues. I'll be watching for the next "study"......."Too much of (insert food) increases mortality risk." This “study” is a joke. They compared two extremes and the researcher himself called the added risks “modest” and it is full of common sense that anyone should know. I guess we’re supposed to take it seriously due to the quantity of participants but they don’t even delve into the socio-economic status of the participants. He also stated that people had to go off memory of what they ate?? Talk about a waste of money…..looks to me like more “global warming” bs and propaganda. I guess this study is meant mainly for the “Sheeple” as I like to call them (see PETA supporters/morons). Anyone knows that most things are fine IN MODERATION and that some lean meat can prevent chronic disease when eaten as part of a balanced diet.

What we need is a study showing how the crap we feed these animals is the biggest detriment to our health and probably contributes to most of the health issues. I’ll be watching for the next “study”…….”Too much of (insert food) increases mortality risk.”

]]> By: Anthony http://www.foodess.com/2009/03/eating-red-meat-increases-risk-of/comment-page-1/#comment-2030 Anthony Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:34:00 +0000 http://www.foodess.com/?p=606#comment-2030 This "study" is a joke. They compared two extremes and the researcher himself called the added risks "modest" and it is full of common sense that anyone should know. I guess we're supposed to take it seriously due to the quantity of participants but they don't even delve into the socio-economic status of the participants. He also stated that people had to go off memory of what they ate?? Talk about a waste of money.....looks to me like more "global warming" bs and propaganda. I guess this study is meant mainly for the "Sheeple" as I like to call them (see PETA supporters/morons). Anyone knows that most things are fine IN MODERATION and that some lean meat can prevent chronic disease when eaten as part of a balanced diet. What we need is a study showing how the crap we feed these animals is the biggest detriment to our health and probably contributes to most of the health issues. I'll be watching for the next "study"......."Too much of (insert food) increases mortality risk." This “study” is a joke. They compared two extremes and the researcher himself called the added risks “modest” and it is full of common sense that anyone should know. I guess we’re supposed to take it seriously due to the quantity of participants but they don’t even delve into the socio-economic status of the participants. He also stated that people had to go off memory of what they ate?? Talk about a waste of money…..looks to me like more “global warming” bs and propaganda. I guess this study is meant mainly for the “Sheeple” as I like to call them (see PETA supporters/morons). Anyone knows that most things are fine IN MODERATION and that some lean meat can prevent chronic disease when eaten as part of a balanced diet.

What we need is a study showing how the crap we feed these animals is the biggest detriment to our health and probably contributes to most of the health issues. I’ll be watching for the next “study”…….”Too much of (insert food) increases mortality risk.”

]]>